A Former DEA and DOJ Attorney on Your Side

Dhairya Jani

About Dhairya Jani

DEA Regulatory Defense & Vaccine Injury Compensation Attorney 

Dhairya Jani founded Jani Law PLLC to represent healthcare practitioners, pharmacies, distributors, manufacturers, and other DEA-registered businesses facing DEA enforcement actions, and individuals pursuing compensation through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). In both areas, the cases are specialized, the stakes are high, and experience is the only equalizer.

His background is distinct. In the VICP, he served as a federal judicial law clerk at the Vaccine Court deciding these cases, then as a lead DOJ Trial Attorney litigating more than 85 of them for the government. In DEA enforcement, he built and litigated these cases from inside the Agency as Diversion Enforcement Counsel.

He launched Jani Law PLLC in February 2026 to bring that decade of experience entirely to bear for the registrants and individuals who need it most. Practiced from the inside. Now entirely on your side.

Three Perspectives. One Practice.

Jani Law PLLC is the direct application of Dhairya Jani’s work as a dedicated public servant.

The Adjudicator’s Perspective.

Dhairya began his path as a federal judicial law clerk at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters, the Vaccine Court.

For over three years, Dhairya clerked for two Special Masters, managing a large docket of contested vaccine injury cases and drafting the rulings that resolved them, including:

  • Decisions on whether a vaccine caused the alleged injury and whether compensation was warranted 
  • Fact rulings resolving factual disputes in contested vaccine injury claims
  • Causation analyses evaluating the strength of petitioner and government expert theories
  • Damages determinations covering medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering
  • Assessments of competing medical expert theories, deciding which the Special Master found persuasive
  • Procedural rulings managing the progression of active cases through hearing

Dhairya developed a precise understanding of how Special Masters evaluate the cases before them, what the evidentiary record needs to show at every stage, and what separates the claims that succeed from those that do not.

The Government Litigator’s Perspective.

Dhairya then moved to the counsel table as a Trial Attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), representing the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the respondent in all VICP proceedings.

As a lead DOJ trial attorney in more than 85 cases, he:

  • Reviewed petitioners’ medical records and causation theories to assess the strength of their claims and determine the government’s litigation strategy
  • Identified and prepared medical experts to challenge petitioners’ causation theories at trial
  • Examined and cross-examined fact witnesses, medical experts, and treating physicians at evidentiary hearings before Special Masters
  • Evaluated when the government’s own exposure warranted settlement and negotiated those resolutions directly
  • Briefed and argued a case on appeal before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Dhairya developed a thorough understanding of what makes VICP claims succeed, how the government assesses its own exposure, and where the pressure points in settlement negotiations actually lie. He has done everything these cases demand, from the first medical record to the final appeal, and done it from the inside. That knowledge now works entirely for petitioners.

Jani

The Enforcement Counsel’s Perspective.

Dhairya then joined the DEA as Diversion Enforcement Counsel, where he worked on more than 55 administrative enforcement actions spanning every registrant category, including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, dentists, independent and large-scale pharmacies, distributors, importers, and manufacturers.

He practiced the full lifecycle of DEA enforcement:

  • Directing investigative strategy
  • Drafting and directing the issuance of administrative subpoenas
  • Drafting and issuing Orders to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension Orders
  • Full motions practice before hearings
  • Direct and cross-examination of fact witnesses, diversion investigators, and expert witnesses at DEA administrative hearings before Administrative Law Judges
  • Post-hearing briefing through the DEA Administrator’s Final Order

Dhairya understands not just the law but how these cases are built from the inside, and where the leverage lies at every stage of the proceeding.

Federal Service and What It Means for Clients

Drafting the rulings. Litigating the cases. Building the enforcement actions.

Years of federal service across DEA enforcement and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program produced something that knowing the law and private practice experience alone cannot: a firsthand understanding of how these cases are actually decided, where they succeed, where they fail, and what it takes to win. That understanding is what every client at Jani Law PLLC receives from the first call through the final resolution.

Diversion Enforcement Counsel — Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Chief Counsel

Fifty-five-plus complex administrative enforcement actions. Every stage of how DEA enforcement actually works:

  • Data analysis and investigative development
  • Drafting, reviewing, and advising on administrative subpoena issuance under 21 U.S.C. § 876.
  • Pre-charging evidence building
  • Drafting and issuing Orders to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension Orders
  • Full motions practice before hearings
  • Evidentiary hearing practice before DEA Administrative Law Judges, including direct and cross-examination of fact witnesses, diversion investigators, and expert witnesses.
  • Post-hearing briefing through the DEA Administrator’s Final Order
  • Memorandum of Agreement negotiation, including compliance program restructuring for a large pharmaceutical manufacturer registrant

Additional matters included Suspicious Orders Reporting System (SORS) compliance under the Substance Use Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities (SUPPORT) Act and the development of a comprehensive Controlled Substance Act (CSA) compliance architecture for a peyote manufacturer operating within the framework of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA).

What This Means for DEA Defense Clients


Dhairya Jani has practiced the DEA’s administrative enforcement proceedings at every stage and brings that depth of experience entirely to your defense.

Federal Judicial Law Clerk — U.S. Court of Federal Claims, Office of Special Masters

  • Clerked for two Special Masters
  • Handled the daily management of a large docket of contested vaccine injury cases, drafting procedural and substantive rulings on motions, fact rulings, entitlement decisions, causation analyses, and damages determinations
  • Developed a precise understanding of VICP adjudication from inside the decision-making process

What This Means for Vaccine Injury Clients


The perspective developed inside the decision-making chamber, understanding how evidence is evaluated before a word of advocacy is written, is the foundation on which every VICP case at this firm is built.

Trial Attorney — U.S. Department of Justice, Torts Branch (Vaccine Litigation)

Trial attorney representing the Secretary of Health and Human Services in 85-plus vaccine injury cases filed at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. Every phase of litigation:

  • Medical and factual record development, causation theory, expert witness selection, and preparation on complex scientific and medical issues
  • Negotiated settlements in numerous cases where the facts supported resolution
  • Pre- and post-hearing briefing
  • Evidentiary bench trials before Special Masters
  • Appellate briefing and oral argument before the U.S. Court of Federal Claims

What This Means for Vaccine Injury Clients


Dhairya Jani has practiced the VICP from every angle and brings that full perspective to building your vaccine injury case.

Jani

Education & Legal Experience

Bar Admissions


  • District of Columbia
  • Maryland
  • Texas
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims

Education


University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

  • Bachelor of Science, Biology

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

  • Juris Doctor
  • Staff Editor at the Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy 

Languages


English, Hindi, Gujarati

Professional Affiliations


  • American Bar Association, Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section
  • American Bar Association, Health Law Section
  • D.C. Bar Association
  • Vaccine Injured Petitioners Bar Association
  • Court of Federal Claims Bar Association
  • South Asian Bar Association of Washington, D.C.
  • National Organization of Rare Disorders (NORD) – Rare Action Network Member